Coroner links fatality to unapproved “peptides”

In March 2025, 75 year old Richard Norton passed away following cardiac arrest after he had injected the growth hormone analogue CJC-1295, and the synthetic pentapeptide (or “peptide”) Ipamorelin. 

On Wednesday 28th October this year, Coroner David Ryan handed down his findings that Norton’s death resulted from his use of the peptides and hormone analogue. This is the first confirmed fatality from peptide use in Australia, although not the first time Australian health authorities have expressed concern at this rising unregulated trend.

Norton had been prescribed the unapproved medications from his doctor, Jerzy Muchnicki, yet hours before his death he told a nurse at the practice he had been “double dosing”. The ABC report that the nurse advised him to follow the prescribed dosage, yet shortly after when Norton injected a dose of CJC-1295 and Ipamorelin, he became unresponsive.

Coroner advises Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA)

The ABC further report:

The coroner recommended the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) review the therapeutic benefits and safety risks of peptides such as CJC-1295 and Ipamorelin and “consider whether further restrictions ought to be imposed on their use”.

In May this year the TGA published a warning on the risks of importing such unapproved peptides, with particular emphasis on the lack of proper labelling and the absence of safety testing. This was followed by another in June, in conjunction with Australia’s Chief Medical Officer. Following the coronial finding the TGA stated that it:

… continues to warn consumers about the risks of unapproved peptides which have not been assessed by the TGA for safety, quality or effectiveness.

And:

We are continuing to assess the risks associated with these products and considering whether further regulatory or other measures may be appropriate.

Medical Board Investigation

The coronial report into Norton’s death noted that The Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency had previously been notified about Dr. Muchnicki’s treatment of Norton. The Medical Board of Australia (MBA) conducted an investigation, including a report from clinical professor Alistair Vickery. Professor Vickery observed:

There is insufficient evidence that CJC1295/Ipamorelin is safe, effective or beneficial for human use.

However, given Norton’s prior use of peptides and the written consent Dr. Muchnicki had gained from Norton, Vickery stated, “the clinical care provided by Dr Muchnicki was at a standard reasonably expected”. Nonetheless he observed Muchnicki’s notes were sparse and his performance as a practitioner was below standard for such an issue.

What are peptides? What is “stacking”?

Chemically speaking, perhaps the best way to grasp what a peptide is, is to revisit what proteins are. This Wikipedia page on proteins has an image displaying the 3D nature of proteins, and touches on the nature of peptides. Proteins contain a minimum of 50 amino acids. Proteins will contain at least one polypeptide consisting of multiple peptides (above 50). The peptides that we’re interested in are best described as short chains of amino acids linked by peptide bonds. You are most welcome to read up on peptide bonds here. 

Peptides (oligopeptides) contain 2 to 20 amino acids. We eat peptides, our body manufactures them and they can of course be manufactured in laboratories. The action of peptides explains their popularity. They bind to receptors on many types of cells and signal the promotion of biological processes. These may be pain relief (endorphins), skin repair and elasticity (collagen) and indeed those which have become very important to weight loss (GLP-1) and blood sugar control (insulin). Thus anti-ageing, weight loss, muscle growth and injury recovery are common claims from influencers pushing peptides.

“Stacking” involves the use of specific peptides and pentapeptides to achieve a spike in growth hormone and an extension of its half life. For example in the case of Richard Norton, his use of CJC-1295 is an unapproved way to stimulate the pituitary gland to release more growth hormone. When combined or “stacked” with the peptide Ipamorelin, the aim is to evoke a growth hormone spike, which is sustained by the growth hormone releasing analogue CJC-1295. Better known as a Drug Affinity Complex (DAC), CJC-1295 may elevate growth hormone by up to 10 times for 6 days, and insulin-like growth factor (IGF-1) three-fold, by up to 11 days.

Peptide induced harm and hospitalisation

As the use of peptides has risen in Australia, so has the level of physical harm and consequent hospitalisation. In August this year the death from heart failure of Alex Boutin, led to increased focus on peptide use, from The Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency. In fact, Boutin’s death led to further consideration of how social media also impacts male users developing irrational obsession with body image. Use of steroids and peptides in men, is an indicator of a potential eating disorder, according to experts. [Peptide use linked to eating disorders – ABC AM programme – 3min, 7s].

NSW Health documented 1,180 presentations to hospital emergency departments following peptide use, between July 1, 2025, and September 30, 2026. Monthly attendances increased from 5 to over 220 during this period. In June this year, Victoria reported acute care requirements for severe anaphylaxis, acute liver toxicity and hospital admission resulting from peptides. Particularly Retatrutide, Reta, R-10 and R-20. WA has reported similar concerns as has QLD, Tasmania, the ACT and the NT. 

Harms reported, overwhelmingly stress liver and kidney damage, unexplained hepatitis, unexplained acute pancreatitis, anaphylaxis and severe allergic reactions, GI distress and intractable vomiting. Warnings note that unsterile injecting can lead to systemic infections, sepsis, cellulitis or tissue damage resulting in amputations and skin grafts. Where testing has been done the peptide preparation has included impurities or been as low as 51% or as high as 190% of the advertised concentration. Some lack the ingredients entirely.

Unapproved and untested products include Retatrutide (liver toxicity), BPC-157, TB-500, CHK-Cu, CJC-1295, Melanotan II and more. In June this year RFK Jr. “unbanned” 14 peptides. You can read more on this here. The demand for peptides in Australia has been so great that Needle and Syringe Programmes established to prevent the spread of blood borne disease amongst injection drug users, have reported an impact on service provision.

There is little doubt that the promotion of peptides on social media is having a rapid and deleterious effect on many of those who choose to use them. Finally, there is no reliable evidence that influencers can offer improved health and longevity to their followers.

Further Reading:

RFK Jr is wrong about RFK Jr is wrong about mRNA vaccines – a scientist explains how they make COVID less deadlyRFK Jr is wrong about

©️The Conversation
7th August 2025
Deborah Dunn-Walters

US health secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr has announced he is cancelling US$500 million (£374 million) of research into mRNA vaccines, citing unproven concerns about their safety and long-term effects.

Kennedy has claimed that mRNA vaccines “encourage new mutations and can actually prolong pandemics” – a misleading statement that contradicts the scientific consensus on viral evolution and effects of vaccination.

But scientific research shows that mRNA vaccines have saved millions of lives.

As an immunologist, I’ve spent years studying how the body responds to SARS-CoV-2 and other respiratory viruses. Let’s be clear: there is no credible evidencethat mRNA vaccines cause viral mutations – genetic changes that occur as a virus copies itself – or that they’re ineffective against respiratory infections like COVID-19 or flu. These claims misrepresent both how viruses evolve and how vaccines actually work.

Unlike traditional vaccines, which introduce weakened or inactive parts of a virus to trigger immunity, mRNA vaccines work by delivering genetic instructions that teach our cells to produce a harmless piece of the virus (usually a protein found on its surface). This gives the immune system a preview of what to fight, so it’s ready if the real virus shows up.

Our bodies are constantly fighting off infectious organisms – viruses, bacteria and other pathogens – that rely on us as hosts to survive and reproduce. As part of this ongoing battle, viruses naturally mutate over time. This process happens with or without vaccines.

Each time a virus replicates, small copying errors can occur in its genetic material. Some of these mutations have no impact; others give the virus a competitive advantage, helping it spread more efficiently. That’s how new variants arise.

In the case of COVID-19, scientists observed that the virus was mutating from the start. Variants appeared both within individuals (“intra-host variation”) and between them (“inter-host variation”). Every so often, one version would gain a competitive advantage – spreading faster, evading immunity, or becoming more infectious – and take over. These are the variants you might remember: alpha, delta, omicron.

This is how evolution works: organisms reproduce and change, and some changes help them thrive.

The immune system’s defence

Now, let’s look at the other side of the battle: our immune system.

Some parts of our immune defence are always on: physical barriers like skin, and innate immune responses that are ready to fight anything unfamiliar. But our most powerful defence is adaptive immunity: a specialised response that targets a specific invader once it’s been identified.

This is where vaccines come in. When a virus invades the body for the first time, it can cause serious illness before our adaptive immune system knows how to respond. But vaccines, including mRNA vaccines, act like a rehearsal. They introduce a harmless piece of the virus (often a single protein) so the immune system can learn to recognise it and respond faster in the future.

mRNA vaccines work by delivering a snippet of genetic instructions to our cells, which then produce the viral protein temporarily. Our immune system then builds a response to it. This means we get all the immune training with none of the illness – unlike actual infection, which can be dangerous.

Vaccines don’t cause viruses to mutate. The mutations already exist – they emerge randomly and constantly during viral replication. What vaccines (and our immune systems) do is filter which variants survive.

When the original COVID-19 virus encountered a population with strong immune defences – built through vaccination or past infection – it was effectively stopped. That virus lost its competitive edge. But other, naturally occurring variants with slightly different surface proteins (the “outer coat”) could sometimes sneak past these defences. That’s how new variants emerged.

Importantly, neither vaccines nor natural immunity created those mutations – they simply selected which ones became dominant.

The good news

There’s a silver lining. Even when a variant partially evades immune defences, our bodies often still recognise parts of it. This is called cross-reactivity – and it can mean we get less sick, even with a new strain.

Over time, as we’re exposed to more variants through infection or updated vaccines, our immune system refines its response. It becomes better prepared to fight future versions of the virus – just like it’s done with flu and other infectious diseases.

COVID-19 hasn’t disappeared, but thanks to mRNA vaccines and our growing immune memory, it’s far less deadly than it was in 2020.

Despite the claims of high-profile figures like RFK Jr, mRNA vaccines do not cause viruses to mutate. Mutations are part of viral evolution: a natural process that happens regardless of our intervention.

What vaccines do is give us a fighting chance. They’ve saved millions of lives by reducing severe illness, hospitalisations and death. They remain one of the most powerful tools we have in the ongoing battle against infectious disease.

James Randi in Australia – 45th Anniversary Edition

This wonderful programme is a digitally restored version of a 45 year old skeptic analysis on water divining, conducted under the auspices of James Randi.

Listen more to how this came about via The Skeptic Zone Episode 870.

YouTube Synopsis:

In 1980 James “The Amazing” Randi was flown to Australia by Dick Smith to conduct the definitive test of the claims of Water Diviners or Dowers. This event helped to launch the Australian Skeptics. The original documentary of the event commissioned by Dick Smith and broadcast on Australian television, has been lost for decades, with the only known copy being one recorded via a VCR in 1980. To celebrate the 45th anniversary of the event, the documentary has been digitally restored to sparkling clarity, including a sound remix, from the VCR version. Keep watching after the credits to see some of the improvements in this new upscaled version.

Vale Roy Arnott

Terry Kelly and Ken Greatorex share their thoughts about former Treasurer, Roy Arnott.

It is with great sadness that we report the death of the former Treasurer of the Australian Skeptics Victorian Branch (Inc), Roy Arnott (OAM).

Roy Arnott

Roy was a formidable Treasurer for many years and he also contributed largely to sorting out our Constitution. He was a clear thinker, thorough, and a particularly pithy communicator…”. The Prince Of Pith” he was labelled. Those of you who attended skeptic events at La Notte in Lygon Street Carlton, may also remember Roy assessing door takings. After counting heads and coins Roy would ultimately announce, “Correct weight”. 

This ability to say a lot in a few words also enabled him to be a regularly published contributor to The Age “Letters To The Editor”. They weren’t long letters. Nonetheless, on the topic of military history and skepticism, Roy penned An Atheist in the Army in 2009 [The Skeptic March 2009, p.48].

Roy was also humorous, warm, charming and good company. He has been greatly missed in Skeptics circles since his health made it difficult to maintain his regular and much valued Skeptical activities.

In one of his other lives Roy was awarded an OAM (Medal of the Order of Australia) [The Skeptic Sept 2015, p.5]. The official citation states his award was on 8th June 2015 as part of the Queen’s Birthday Honours List. Roy was recognised for service to the preservation of military history, and to veterans. 

Roy enlisted in the CMF (later the Australian Army Reserve) in 1959 retiring as a Warrant Officer Class 2 in 1996.

His civilian career was in the Australian Public Service, mainly in Defence related departments. In the latter years Roy transferred from Defence and his terminal posting with the APS was a six year term with the Australian National Audit Office.

He subsequently did consultancy work for the Government post retirement and was given his OAM mainly for his voluntary work with the army Museum and its history. Roy curated for the Prince of Wales Light Horse Regiment, spending a day per week at the museum/reading room at the Watsonia Barracks. Roy also authored a small book on the history of the regiment, published in 2008.

He was also adept at setting and solving cryptic crosswords. Vic Skeptics website featured a monthly skeptical crossword puzzle. For about 8 years it came with two sets of clues: Ken Greatorex supplied the “straight” set of clues and Roy provided the “cryptic” set, i.e. about 100 sets. These were popular with viewers from around the world.

Finally – and Roy might have enjoyed this – he was difficult to find in The Age Obituaries because he was listed as Roy Arnott OAM, so he was in the “O”s, a long way from the “A”s (A.I. fail?). It wouldn’t have been a laugh out loud respone, more like a wry grin and a sigh of great amusement.

Highly respected and sadly missed.

Condolences to his wife June and family.

Terry Kelly and Ken Greatorex.

Surf Coast Skepticamp 2025

It’s time once again to start thinking about Surf Coast Skepticamp – the delightful gathering of skeptics at Aireys Inlet on the Great Ocean Road.

This year the event is being held at Aireys Inlet Community Hall from 10.30am to 4.30pm. The journey from Melbourne is around 1 hour 45 minutes by combustion engine, battery, or hybrid powered vehicles. Time absolutely slides by as the stunning vista of Great Ocean Road scenery cruises by. The cost, of course, is free. But you can still help with arrangements by popping into Eventbrite here and picking up a ticket. Full details are available there also.

Topics covered in the past include: UFOs (Saunders & Dunning beamed live from Bend, Oregon!), Anti-vaxxers after COVID, Going Solar, Fake Martial Arts, Catching Academic Cheats, Climate change in Australia: fact vs. fiction, Crowdfunding Scams, Shayna Jack, sports supplements and regulators, The Weeping Woman and Other Tales: The Belief in the Supernatural in Latin America, Quiz: Just how smart are skeptics?, and much more.

Come along and enjoy the day. Or, why not bring your interests to Skepticamp and present a 20 minute-ish talk? If that sounds like you, just drop an email with your details and chosen topic to the Contact Us page above. Skeptical thoughts on public health, alternatives to medicine, communicating with the dead, UFO/UAP reports, or the many bizarre claims reaching social media; any and all are welcome. 

We break for lunch and visit the various eateries around Aireys Inlet then finish the evening with a wind down and meal at Aireys pub. 

See you there!

Melanie Tracek-King at CONASTA

On July 8, Melanie Tracek-King attended the Australian Science Teachers Association Conference (CONASTA) in Melbourne, where she presented “Teach Skills, Not Facts.” The talk attracted high school science teachers, lab coordinators and science curriculum specialists.

During the session, she emphasized the importance of teaching critical thinking, information literacy, and science literacy.

The Australian Skeptics Victorian Branch were pleased to be able to sponsor her involvement in the conference and ever so grateful that she was able to make an extra stop in Melbourne to attend the event.

The UFO Movie THEY Don’t Want You to See

When it comes to UFO documentaries, The UFO Movie THEY Don’t Want You To See offers in depth answers from the relevant scientific disciplines that help us understand, “exactly what we know and how we know it” on the topic of UFOs, or if you prefer, UAPs.

Suffice it to say these in depth answers don’t include the beliefs of journalist Ross Coulthart, winner of The Australian Skeptics 2023 Bent Spoon Award. Executive officer Tim Mendham helps us understand in noting:

Coulthart won for his recent espousal of UFO conspiracy theories and claims that alien bodies and wrecked spacecraft are being held in secret by various government across the world – claims he makes based on hearsay with no evidence, no bodies, no space junk.

The UFO Movie THEY Don’t Want You To See is a feature length indie documentary produced and directed by science writer Brian Dunning. You likely know Brian from the award winning Skeptoid podcast, appearances at numerous Skeptic conferences – including Skepticon Australia – articles in The Skeptic magazine, Skeptical Inquirer or guest spots on other Skeptic media, such as The Skeptic Zone podcast. A great deal of work has gone into making and producing this movie, so let’s get to it.

In an age when misinformation, alternative facts, and conspiracy theories have become mainstream, UFOs have risen to become one of the most-talked about pop culture phenomena. With all of this noise, how can we expect anyone to know how much of this is true? What is in our skies? What do we know, and how do we know it? And most importantly: Are we being visited?

Science does have most of these answers, and we’re working on answering the rest of them. The film features experts in:

  • Physics & relativity
  • Exobiology
  • Exoplanetary spectral analysis
  • Image analysis
  • Pilot training and air traffic control
  • Defense

For more information about the movie, there’s an FAQ page here. If you’ve seen it you no doubt want to watch again. If you haven’t seen it pop the kettle on, draw the curtains and enjoy…

Nate Eggins – Conspiracy Of One – to entertain Skepticon diners

Entertainment for Skepticon’s Saturday night dinner, will be courtesy of Brisbane-based songwriter, musician and science communicator, Nate Eggins. In addition, Nate will also be one of the Skepticon MCs. With thought-provoking lyrics, Nate aims:

To encourage interest in science, promote critical thinking and with his quirky sense of humour, playfully nudge us to second-guess pseudoscience, modern advertising and conspiracy theories through fun catchy clever music.

Nate, a multi-instrumentalist, has used his talent and interest to create the solo project, Conspiracy of One. Described as A bit sciency, A bit funny,Conspiracy of One sold out two live performances at the Brisbane Planetarium, for the release of Nate’s debut album, Road To Reason.

Skeptics and fans of the Australian Skeptics podcast The Skeptic Zone are likely familiar with Nate’s 2021 hit, The Sound a Duck Makes. Indeed your “Quack!” vocal may well be on it. Road To Reason reflects Nate’s journey, “from the darkness of ignorance toward the light of scientific and critical thinking”.

Hit songs from the album include Can You Guess My Star Sign? which features Dr Karl Kruszelnicki, The Song THEY Don’t Want You To Hear and It’s Not You, It’s Corona. Great music and good humour with dinner, in the company of skeptics? Sounds like a great night.

https://skepticon.org.au/speaker/nate-eggins/

You can learn more about Nate Eggins on his Facebook page, Instagram or check out some of his music on YouTube.

The Saturday night dinner is at the St. Andrews Conservatory in Nicholson St. Fitzroy. If you’d like a ticket, please visit Try Booking.

Clinical psychologist will chat to Skepticon audience

Gary Bakker is a clinical psychologist with over 40 years experience. His talk at the upcoming Australian Skeptics national convention is titled, Sex, gender and identity: The politics and the science.

https://skepticon.org.au/speaker/gary-bakker/

Gary notes:

It has been very hard to get past the politics of issues around sex, gender, and identity while trying to apply the science to our legal and social policy decision-making. For example, it took several submissions to journals before my two articles on the topic – ‘Sex, gender, and identity: It’s complicated’ and ‘Sex, gender, and identity: Science or politics?’ – were published, both eventually in Rationale, the journal of the Rationalist Society of Australia.

Even Skeptical Inquirer “didn’t want to go there” because any moderate contribution is attacked (cancelled) by both of the vocal extremes on the issue.

Visit Skepticon 2023 for more information or look for tickets here.

Don’t miss Katharine Shade’s journey to skepticism

This year at The Australian Skeptics national convention, Katharine Shade will reveal her journey from the fog and confusion of woo, to the glaring clarity of skepticism.

https://skepticon.org.au/speaker/katharine-shade/

Such ventures from the badlands of belief, tend to feature similarities. Katharine will tell of her escape from the healing that never healed, of living with faith in the so-called “dis-ease” model beloved by fundamentalist chiropractors, and even diving headlong into the semi-aquatic theory of human evolution. 

Her tale promises to have a happy ending, as Katharine ultimately succeeded in broadening her approach to learning accepted truths. However, she says it took a bit more time to learn enough skills to be able to more precisely attribute plausibility, and understand how a theory that seems perfectly valid, can be bogus.

You too can follow Katharine’s journey at Skepticon 2023 and even finish off the day at the entertainment packed dinner. Or just kick back at home on the couch, and watch online. Tickets are available here.